Abstract

Research Article

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy-does tumor profile influence the operative performance?

Krishanu Das*, George P Abraham, Kishnamohan Ramaswai, Datson George P, Jisha J Abraham, Thomas Thachill and Oppukeril S Thampan

Published: 10 October, 2017 | Volume 1 - Issue 1 | Pages: 056-060

Introduction: Laparoscopic approach is emerging as a standard of care approach for management of masses amenable to partial nephrectomy. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a challenging surgery and its successful performance depends on various factors. We aim to evaluate the influence of tumor characterestics on the operative performance for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Methods: Patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in our institution were recruited for this study. The tumor profile was evaluated by a senior radiologist from cross sectional imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). Tumor characerestics was defined by assessing tumor size, tumor location and RENAL score. The operative performance was evaluated in terms of warm ischemia time, blood loss, operation duration and any significant operative complications. Statistical inference was drawn.

Results: 37 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy between January 2010 and June 2012 were included in this study. The mean tumor dimension was 3.81 cms. 21 tumors involved left kidney and 16 involved right kidney. 12 were located in upper pole, 8 were located in midpole and 17 were located in lower pole. The average RENAL score was 6.56. The mean warm ischemia time, blood loss and operation duration was 26.29 minutes (min), 256.76 millilitres (ml) and 208.11 min respectively. Statistically significant correlation was appreciated between tumor location (polar location, side, anterior/ posterior location) and RENAL score and operative parameters (warm ischemia time and operation duration). Tumor size did not have any correlation with the operative parameters.

Conclusion: The operative performance of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is significantly influenced by the tumor location and RENAL score.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.ascr.1001009 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

References

  1. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, Blute ML, Chow GK, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009; 182: 1271-1279. Ref.: https://goo.gl/yPst1a
  2. Dulabon LM, Lowrance WT, Russo P, William C. Huang. Trends in renal tumor surgery delivery within the United states. Cancer. 2010; 116: 2316-2321. Ref.: https://goo.gl/dWw9vC
  3. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The RENAL nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009; 182: 844-853. Ref.: https://goo.gl/cAZTvp
  4. Ficara V, Novara G, Secco S, Macchi V, Porzionato A, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumors in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2009; 56: 786-793. Ref.: https://goo.gl/Q7AKJ5
  5. Simmons MN, Ching CB, Sampalski MK, Park CH, Gill IS. Kidney tumor location measurement using the C-index method. J Urol. 2010; 183: 1708-1713. Ref.: https://goo.gl/YMAJ81
  6. Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, Murphy DP, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol. 2002; 167: 469-477. Ref.: https://goo.gl/DNjEDD
  7. Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Steinberg A, et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol. 2003; 170: 64-68. Ref.: https://goo.gl/bMzNXH
  8. Hew MN, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K, Axwijk PH, Can C, et al. Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the RENAL Nephrometry score in patients undergoing Partial Nephrectomy. J Urol. 2011: 186: 42-46. Ref.: https://goo.gl/UpAkoJ
  9. Sampalski MK, Hernandez A, Gill IS, Simmons MN. C-index is associated with functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2010; 184: 2259-2263. Ref.: https://goo.gl/mrrH5Z
  10. Waldert M, Waalkes S, Klatte T, Markus A. Kuczyk, Peter Weibl, et al. External validation of the preoperative anatomical classification for prediction of complications related to nephron-sparing surgery. World J Urol. 2010; 28: 531-535. Ref.: https://goo.gl/BL3NAa

Figures:

Figure 1

Figure 1

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More